As a prominent science communicator appearing on television, radio and in print, how do you balance academic rigour with making complex psychological insights accessible?

I have always believed that scientists have a responsibility to communicate their findings beyond academia. That communication, however, must be dialogical rather than didactic. Engaging the public in genuine exchange ensures that research remains relevant and responsive, builds trust and accountability, and strengthens the likelihood that our work delivers meaningful societal benefit.

Body image intersects with culture, media and self-perception. What are the most pressing challenges facing body image research today, and where do you see the field heading?

Our research indicates that negative body image and appearance-related anxieties are widespread globally, particularly in urbanised contexts, where a majority report some form of dissatisfaction. This represents a significant public health concern, given the links between negative body image, disordered eating, diminished psychological well-being, and reduced interpersonal confidence. While understanding the underlying causes remains critical, it is equally important to develop robust interventions that enable as many people as possible to experience their bodies in more positive and affirming ways.

Looking ahead, are there new areas of psychology or interdisciplinary work that excite you?

Building on our research into nature contact, I believe psychological scientists must strengthen collaborations with colleagues in allied disciplines such as ecology, engineering, urban development, environmental health, and epidemiology. Interdisciplinary approaches are essential, not only to protect the natural environment, but also to develop holistic strategies for promoting health through meaningful engagement with the natural world.